Many process data mining efforts fail to deliver real improvement because they only highlight what went wrong, not why it happened. Teams can see performance drops, delays, or repeated failures, but struggle to trace the cause behind them.
This is where Root Cause Analysis (RCA) becomes essential; it helps connect the visible problem to the actual breakdown in the process. This article explains how RCA works, its core principles, and its role in improving outcomes through process data mining.
Check out our article “What is Process Data Mining? Applications and Benefits” to understand the core concepts and how they can benefit your company.
What is Root Cause Analysis (RCA)?
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is a problem-solving method used to find the real reason why a problem or failure occurred. Instead of just fixing the visible issue, RCA goes deeper to uncover the underlying causes that triggered the problem in the first place.
In business processes or systems, RCA is used to investigate performance gaps, data errors, system failures, or process inefficiencies. When combined with process data mining, RCA becomes more effective because data mining tools extract actual event logs from systems. These logs help trace process steps, variations, and delays.
RCA uses this mined data to connect the problem (effect) back to the exact breakdown point (cause). This makes it possible to understand what happened, where it happened, and why—so the issue can be fixed properly and prevented from repeating.
Why RCA Matters
Helps prevent problems from happening again instead of just treating symptoms
Reduces long-term costs by fixing the actual cause of issues
Improves process efficiency by removing repeated blockers
Makes it easier to detect failures early using accurate data trails
Supports regulatory and quality compliance by identifying root violations
Enhances team accountability by making cause-and-effect relationships visible
Builds stronger systems by focusing on stability, not short-term fixes
Types of Root Cause Analysis
These types are especially relevant in process data mining environments:
Process Design Issues: Flaws in how a process is structured (e.g., too many steps, missing controls)
Data Input Errors: Inaccurate or incomplete data entries affecting downstream processes
System Integration Failures: Breakdown in communication between connected tools or platforms
Workflow Logic Gaps: Missing or incorrect logic in how tasks or approvals are triggered
Human Operation Mistakes: Manual errors that are repeated due to unclear procedures or a lack of training
Master Data Inconsistencies: Conflicting or outdated master records leading to process mismatches
Automation Rule Conflicts: When process automation scripts or triggers produce unintended results due to poor configuration
Principles of Root Cause Analysis
1. Focus on Real Causes, Not Symptoms
A symptom is the visible problem, like a failed process or a delayed output. But fixing a symptom does not solve the real issue. Root Cause Analysis requires you to look behind the symptom and identify what actually caused it.
For example, if an automated task fails often, the real cause might not be the task itself but the wrong data being sent from another system.
Focusing on real causes helps avoid temporary fixes that keep problems coming back.
2. Use Data and Facts to Support RCA
Assumptions and guesses make RCA unreliable. You need actual data to understand what happened. This includes process logs, user actions, timestamps, and system alerts.
Process data mining tools are useful here because they pull exact event data from systems. This data lets you see how the process ran, where delays happened, and which conditions were present when the problem occurred. This makes your RCA evidence-based, not opinion-based.
3. Follow a Logical and Structured Path
RCA must be done in a step-by-step way. Start by defining the problem clearly. Then ask questions to trace it backward, such as what happened before the issue and what changed in the system.
Use techniques like the 5 Whys or process mapping to stay on track. A structured approach avoids jumping to conclusions and helps identify connections between systems, actions, and failures.
4. Prevent Recurrence of Problems
The goal of RCA is not just to understand what went wrong but to make sure it does not happen again. This means putting controls in place, updating process rules, fixing configuration errors, or improving training.
You should also monitor the process after applying the fix to confirm that the problem is truly resolved. A good RCA always ends with a clear action that blocks the same cause from triggering another failure.
For RCA to work effectively, the data behind it must be clean, consistent, and accessible. eSystems supports this by delivering a structured Master Data Management (MDM) approach that ensures all systems rely on the same trusted information. This helps teams investigate root causes with clarity and take action with confidence.
Use Root Cause Analysis (RCA) in Process Data Mining
1. Detect Root Causes of Process Gaps
Process gaps are points where the actual workflow does not match the intended flow. These gaps cause delays, missing outputs, or errors. RCA helps detect the root causes behind these gaps by using data extracted through process mining tools.
For example, if a purchase request gets stuck in approval, RCA can trace the delay back to missing data, a failed trigger, or skipped steps in the system. This allows teams to fix the exact source of the issue instead of fixing the outcome.
2. Improve Workflow Efficiency
Workflows often include repeated tasks, unnecessary handoffs, or outdated steps. RCA, supported by process data mining, shows where time or effort is being wasted. You can study actual process data to find tasks that take too long or steps that are frequently skipped.
RCA then helps understand why those inefficiencies exist, such as unclear rules or wrong system settings. Solving these root causes leads to faster and more consistent workflows.
3. Support Better Operational Decisions
When teams make decisions based on assumptions, they risk applying the wrong solutions. RCA uses real process data to support decision-making.
This includes knowing which part of a process fails most often, what causes those failures, and how they impact performance. Managers can then decide what to fix and what to improve with full visibility into the problem’s origin. RCA helps link decisions directly to measurable causes, not just general observations.
4. Find Patterns That Point to Recurring Issues
Process mining creates a timeline of events for each business process. RCA uses this timeline to identify patterns, such as delays happening after the same event or errors tied to a specific user input. Finding these patterns helps teams recognize issues that repeat under similar conditions.
RCA turns these repeated behaviors into clear causes that can be removed or controlled. This reduces rework and improves consistency across the process.
5. Use MDM to Strengthen Process Data Integrity
Root cause analysis depends on clean and consistent data. If the data is incomplete, outdated, or conflicting across systems, RCA becomes unreliable.
Master Data Management (MDM) helps solve this problem by standardizing and synchronizing core data like customer records, product information, and supplier details.
eSystems MDM ensures that all systems use the same source of truth. This gives RCA a strong base of reliable data to trace failures, delays, and mismatches across systems.
To make RCA more accurate and effective across complex systems, eSystems helps by providing MDM that supports a clean and reliable process data mining foundation.
Top Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Techniques
1. Apply the 5 Whys Method
The 5 Whys method is a simple way to trace a problem back to its root cause by asking “Why?” five times. Each answer becomes the base for the next question.
This technique works well for straightforward issues where a clear chain of events leads to the failure. It helps teams avoid stopping at the first obvious answer and instead reach the real cause behind the event.
However, it should be used with data support to avoid bias in answers.
2. Use the Fishbone (Ishikawa) Diagram
The Fishbone Diagram helps organize possible causes of a problem into categories such as people, process, tools, and data. Each branch of the diagram explores factors that could have contributed to the failure.
This structure helps teams examine multiple angles at once rather than focusing on a single source. It is especially useful when several small issues might combine to create a larger failure in the process.
3. Build a Fault Tree for Complex Problems
Fault Tree Analysis is a visual method that starts with a problem at the top and breaks it down into smaller causes using logic gates like AND and OR.
It is used for complex problems where multiple conditions must occur together to trigger the failure.
This technique shows how different causes are connected and helps identify weak points in systems or workflows that are not immediately visible.
4. Prioritize Issues with Pareto Analysis
Pareto Analysis helps teams focus on the most important causes by using the 80/20 rule. It assumes that about 80 percent of problems come from 20 percent of causes.
By plotting issues based on their frequency or impact, teams can see which problems deserve the most attention.
This method is valuable for setting priorities in process improvement when time and resources are limited.
5. Use MDM to Enable Reliable RCA Inputs
Every RCA technique depends on access to complete and consistent data. When different systems contain conflicting or outdated records, RCA results become less trustworthy.
Master Data Management (MDM) solves this by making sure the same version of customer, product, and process data is used across all systems.
With eSystems' harmonized and enriched master data, RCA becomes more reliable across departments, especially when processes involve multiple teams and platforms.
To make your root cause analysis truly reliable, eSystems MDM provides the clean, consolidated, and synchronized data foundation needed to trace and resolve issues with confidence.
Conclusion
Root Cause Analysis helps identify the true source of problems in business processes by going beyond surface-level symptoms. When supported by accurate process data, RCA enables teams to trace failures back to their root causes and apply solutions that prevent future issues.
It improves efficiency, reduces repeated errors, and supports better decision-making by using structured techniques and factual data.
About eSystems
We are a digital transformation company that helps businesses simplify, automate, and scale their operations using low-code technologies. Our core services include automation, system integration, and Master Data Management (MDM).
We reduce manual work, improve data consistency, and help teams run processes with greater accuracy and speed. We work with IT architects, procurement leads, and process owners to solve real business problems through practical solutions.
If your goal is to strengthen root cause analysis in process data mining, we can support you with clean data and reliable tools. Get started with eSystems to improve how your processes run and how your teams solve problems.
FAQ
1. What is root cause analysis in process mining?
It’s a method that identifies the key reasons behind process issues by analyzing patterns in event logs and process data.
2. How does process mining support RCA?
Process mining provides real data that helps trace the exact point and reason where a process fails or performs below standard.
3. What tools offer automated RCA in process mining?
Several process mining platforms include built-in RCA features that detect process bottlenecks and failure drivers automatically.
4. Why use RCA in process mining instead of manual methods?
RCA in process mining reduces guesswork by using data to find hidden patterns and repeated failures faster and more accurately.
5. What statistical measures are used in RCA dashboards?
Dashboards often use influence scores or probability metrics to show which process elements are most likely to cause failures.
COMMENTS